iholmesPGCert_2025

Category: Inclusive Practice Blogs

Categories
Inclusive Practice Blogs

Inclusive Practice_Blog Post 3_Race

I was taught to see racism only in individual acts of meanness, not in invisible systems conferring dominance on my group.  

                                                  (McIntosh, 1989) 

I remember vividly the aftermath of the murder of Steven Lawrence in Eltham SE London 1993, my heart sank seeing the smiling faces of his killers, secure in the knowledge that the system would prevent them being brought to justice. Steven would have been a little bit older than me, and for me the injustice (just as with any murder) was the life that he would have lived denied by his killers.  

The murder of George Floyd in 2020 by police in the US provoked worldwide ‘Black Lives Matter’ (BLM) protests which served as a catalyst for Equality Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives. However, despite the billions invested (8 billion in US for example) in EDI its effectiveness in driving change is questionable (Sadiq, 2023). The racist murder of Steven Lawrence eventually resulted in the Macpherson Report (1999), hailed as ‘a pivotal moment in the advance of race equality in Britain’ (Gillmore et al., 2017, pp. 848-849). However, the actual progress made since is perhaps equally disheartening.  

Racism refers to both ideological belief of a hierarchy of races and those practices which subordinate certain racial groups (Golash- Borza, 2016). The combination of prejudice and power structures sustain the dominance of white privilege and negatively impact the subordinate groups, ‘white supremacy’ being a system which grants white people unearned privileges, protections and power (Saad, 2020). Bhavnani, Mizra and Meeto (2005) argue that racism is less about the measure of social characteristics and is more about the relationship between the dominant and the subordinate. It can also be covert (Coates and Morrison, 2011) and becomes institutionalized when organizations fail to provide ‘an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin’ (Machpherson, 1999, para 6.34).  

Systemic inequalities may emerge unintentionally and unconsciously (Banaji, Fiske & Massey, 2021) and, in the HE context, examples of systemic and structural racial inequality include gaps in award, retention and progression, under representation of staff, experiences and representation relating to learning, curriculum and research; and differing experiences of ‘othering’, belonging and safety (Advance HE, 2021). 

Using the analytic framework of Critical Race Theory (CRT), Gillmore et al. (2017) explore the impacts on education of the murder of Steven Lawrence and argue that policy interventions have actually widened the gap maintaining Black disadvantage; white students being at least 150% more likely to reach the benchmark, concluding that the negative impacts of policies are much more defined than any reduction in inequality. Likewise, Garrett (2024, p.2) drawing on Advanced HE (2022) data and using a CRT lens finds that whilst the number of white students progressing to professor level increased year on year, the BAME students and academics saw a corresponding decrease. Applying an intersectional lens, the disparity between white and black females is even greater, there being only 61 out of almost 23,000 professors (Ibid, p.1).  

In the education context, ‘policy is always political’ producing the discourse of success and failure, which ultimately provides advantage for some students over others (Bradbury, 2019, p. 256), and whilst the ‘leaky academic pipeline’ is examined at the PhD level by Garett (2024), the start point of this pipeline is primary school entry. A ‘datafied system’ perpetuates social inequalities and white dominance through systematic underestimation of English as an Additional Language (EAL) children, many from minoritized communities (Bradbury, 2019, p. 255). There is a tacit intentionality of policy makers in the design of baseline assessments which disadvantages EAL (often racialized) students from the beginning (Ibid). This will perhaps become more obvious policy in future, a new Reform- led council ‘DOGE’ team in Kent aims to get rid of all English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) teaching provision and have immigrant children use Duolingo (Holl-Allen, 2025).  

Whilst the UAL data shows, for example, comparative data between continuation by ethnicity (see Fig 1) it does not take account of first language, which may offer a more intersectional lens to the ‘leaky pipeline.’ 

Fig 1. Percentage Continuation by Ethnicity (5 way). (UAL, 2025) 

It could also be argued that academia stubbornly refuses to acknowledge its complicity in the reproduction of racial injustice and the recreation of inequality (Warmington, 2018). For example, white Professor James Orr (2022) of Cambridge university, takes aim at Advance HE initiatives such as the Athena Swan and Race Equality Charter, which oblige Universities to “make big structural top-down changes” to teaching, research, appointments, and admissions (significantly the two academics interviewed for this film for the Telegraph are not white).  

Professor Arad Ahmed suggests that the de facto impacts have created an oppressive environment for academics and “have not been helpful for free speech” maintaining that there is plenty of evidence that implicit bias training “forced on staff,” has no impact, and that anti racism training is worse “as it pushes a particular ideology” (Ibid). Dr Vincent Harriman challenges the claim of the Co-chair of Racial Governance Committe that there is substantial evidence of systemic racism which all universities, institutionally, perpetuate, citing five reports of racism in five years, and based on this framing a charity turning universities “woke,” Orr suggests that any future award from advanced HE should be thrown straight in the Cam (Ibid).   

It is worth considering that “white privilege” is often confused with wealth and power, however, in reality, it is the “absence of having to live with the consequences of racism” and whilst overt acts of racist violence and murder can provoke catalysts for change, actual systemic change is resisted by white hegemony whilst simultaneously denying that racism even exists, or that attempts to confront racism are in fact racist themselves – just take a look at the comments to the Channel 4 (2020) video cited above. 

References 

AdvanceHE (2021) ‘Understanding Structural Racism in UK Higher Education: an introduction’ Available at:  https://warwick.ac.uk/services/sg/si/diversity/advance_he_-_understanding_racism_report.pdf (Accessed on 12 June 2025) 

AdvanceHE. (2022) ‘Equality in Higher Education: Statistical Reports 2022’ Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/equality-higher-education-statistical-reports-2022 (Accessed on 12th June 2025) 

Banaji, M. R., Fiske. ,S. T., and Massey, D. S. (2021) ‘Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society’ Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 82.    

Bhavnani, R, Mirza, H S, and Meetoo, V. (2005). Tackling the roots of racism: Lessons for success. Policy Press 

Bradbury, A., (2020) ‘A critical race theory framework for education policy analysis: The case of bilingual learners and assessment policy in England.’ Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(2), pp.241-260 

Channel 4. (2020) The School That Tried to End Racism. [Online}. Youtube. 30 June. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I3wJ7pJUjg  (Accessed on 5th June) 

Coates, R. D., and Morrison, J. (2011) ‘Covert Racism Theories, Institutions, and Experiences Series:  Studies’ in Critical Social Sciences, Volume: 32.    

Garrett, R. (2024) ‘Racism shapes careers: career trajectories and imagined futures of racialised minority PhDs in UK higher education.’ Globalisation, Societies and Education, pp.1–15.   

Gillborn, D., Demack, S., Rollock, N., and Warmington, P. (2017) ‘Moving the goalposts: Education policy and 25 years of the Black/White achievement gap’ British Educational Research Journal Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 848–874 DOI: 10.1002/berj.3297 

Golash-Boza, T. (2016). ‘A critical and comprehensive theory of race and racism’, Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 2(2): 129– 41. 

Holl-Allen, G. (2025) English classes for migrants face the axe under Reform-led council Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/06/05/english-classes-for-migrants-face-the-axe-reform-council/ (Accessed on 12th June 2025)  

Macpherson, W. (1999) ‘The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry,’ London, UK Home Office, Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c2af540f0b645ba3c7202/4262.pdf (Accessed 12th June 2025) 

McIntosh, P. (1989) ‘White privilege: unpacking the invisible knapsack.’ Peace and Freedom. Available at: https://med.umn.edu/sites/med.umn.edu/files/2022-12/White-Privilege_McIntosh-1989.pdf (Accessed on 5 June 2025) 

Orr, J. (2022) Revealed: The charity turning UK universities woke. The Telegraph [Online]. Youtube. 5 August. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRM6vOPTjuU 

Sadiq, A. (2023) Diversity, Equity & Inclusion. Learning how to get it right. TEDx [Online}. Youtube. 2 March. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR4wz1b54hw   

UAL (2025) UG retention and continuation. Available at: https://dashboards.arts.ac.uk/dashboard/ActiveDashboards/DashboardPage.aspx?dashboardid=348a5321-e946-47c1-b9b8-aeb5a841d16c&dashcontextid=638684775887265547 (Accessed on 12th June 2025) 

Warmington, P., foreword to Arday, J., and Mirza, H., (Eds). (2018) Dismantling Race in Higher Education – Racism, Whiteness and Decolonising the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan.  

Categories
Inclusive Practice Blogs

Inclusive Practice_Blog Post Two_Religion

Using Crenshaw’s (1991) lens, this blog focuses on how Muslim women (MW) navigate social and academic spaces, both from a worldview perspective and that of social identity. The hypervisibility of MW via the hijab and niqab materialize assumptions about disempowerment within the faith and culture of Islam and therefore promote the idea of MW’s lack of agency. Despite the Advance HE (2018) recommendations, which includes the promotion of ‘inclusive environments’ and ‘greater awareness of attainment gaps between different groups,’ UAL (2025) attainment data do not consider the intersection of religion as a characteristic.  

Religion is marginalized by secularism (Rekis, 2023, p.782), and the 19th Century division of religious and scientific epistemologies in the West– created a positionality through which religion is classified, however, in much of the world, this separation has not occurred (Appiah, 2014). The conceptualization of a list of paradigm religions and their sub parts, as Appiah (2014) suggests, was the construction of Europeans, who, upon discovering people who were not Christians – to describe what ‘they have instead of Christianity?’ The Equality Act 2010 includes. within its definition, the paradigm religions, but also smaller faiths, providing they have ‘clear structure and belief system’ (McKeown and Dunn, 2021, p.121). 

Rekis (2023, p.784) maintains injustice occurs both when social identity is at stake, and, when ‘a person’s worldview is at stake.’  The conflation of two or more social identities can wrongly create assumptions about how they intersect. However, underestimating the connections potentially denies individuals the credibility to speak on those ‘specific theologies,’ placing individuals at a conceptual disadvantage i.e. MW in the contemporary West (Ibid, p.789). 

The hijab and niqab are problematized through the frame of a highly gendered- Islamophobia emphasizing ‘incompatibility of aspects of Muslim identity with western values’ (Ramadan, 2022, p.34). This discourse designates MW’s ‘radical otherness’ associating it with religio-cultural oppression and backwardness. Participants, in Ramadan’s (2022, p.108) study, disclose the strategies that they employ to mitigate and recalibrate colleagues’ perceptions, wanting to show them that they are ‘like any other person,’ by chatting and joking with them ‘along the corridors to show them that I am not what you see in the media. We are normal people …’ This is an instinct echoed by Simran Jeet Singh: 

When I walk onto an airplane and people are looking at me with fear and funny looks – I strike up conversations – and smile and laugh and eventually pull out pictures of my daughters – so that they can see that I’m just a normal person.  

(Trinity University, 2021) 

In the video, we can see that he is wearing Sikh head covering, part of difference which, along with his beard and brown skin, signify the ‘radical otherness’ which he senses he must diffuse in the context of the post 9.11 world, where these racial and religious signifiers are enough to stimulate the described reaction. Significantly, he is not a Muslim, although the signifiers of his faith, just like the hijab for MW, are effective in focusing the attention and prejudice of the hegemonic white gaze. Also significant, he is a man, so his agency, in respect of choice of the signifiers of his faith, are assumed.  

Jawad (2022) explores the intersection of gender and faith in the context of sport. The notion of women being excluded from participation in Islam is challenged, through the hermeneutical interpretation of the Hadith text as evidence of ‘equality and support for women attaining and maintaining physical capability,’ substantiating the ‘Accept and Respect’ declaration which claims Islam is a religion of enablement and not of prohibition towards women in sport; the onus being on sports educators, administrators, and organizers to ‘incorporate greater awareness of faith-based principles’ and create more inclusive spaces for female Muslims in sport (Ibid). This suggests that adjustment can be made in the hegemonic world to accommodate faith-based differences and (perhaps) highlights the tensions that exist within the perceived need for MW to prove that they are ‘just like’ their colleagues in the dominant culture where their social identity is at stake (as in Ramadan’s 2022 study), and the need to validate a worldview as compatible with the secular world’s claim on gender equality.  

Although not having the same lived experience, my approach (and philosophy) regarding discourse around faith and culture, aligns with that of Simran Jeet Singh: ‘no community is a monolith’ – and I try to foster an environment where the differences within each community can be demonstrated, through developing an understanding of ‘where people are coming from – with empathy’ (Trinity University, 2021). 

Applying intersectionality to awarding gaps helps to understand how identity and social location influence outcomes (Banerjee, 2024, p.35). The current UAL (2025) data for the student population shows that nearly 60% of the cohort would identify as secular (i.e. no religion) and of those declaring religious membership – Christian (12%) followed by Muslim (4.2%) are the largest groups (see fig 1). However, whilst data is presented regarding attainment and gender (see fig 2), and ethnicity (see fig 3), there is no data on religion, or for that matter, data that helps illustrate the relationship between intersecting identities (e.g. religion, race and gender) and attainment, ultimately a (quantitative) KPI of EDI.  

Figure 1: Student Profiles – Characteristics: Religion (UAL, 2025)  

 Figure 2: Attainment Rates by Profile: Gender. (UAL, 2025)  

Figure 3: Attainment Rates by Profile: Ethnicity 5 ways. (UAL 2025)  

References: 

Advance HE (2018) ‘Religion and belief: supporting inclusion of staff and students in higher education and colleges Section 3: Student inclusion: access, experience and learning’ Advance HE 

Appiah, K.A. (2014) Is religion good or bad? (This is a trick question) Available at: https://youtu.be/X2et2KO8gcY (Accessed on 15.05.25)  

Banarjee, P. (2024) ‘Connecting the dots: a systematic review of explanatory factors linking contextual indicators, institutional culture and degree awarding gaps,’ Higher Education Evaluation and Development Vol. 18 No. 1, 2024 pp. 31-52 DOI 10.1108/HEED-07-2023-0020 

Crenshaw, K. (1991) ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.’ Stanford Law Review 43 (6), pp.1241-1299   

Jawad, H. (2022) Islam, Women and Sport: The Case of Visible Muslim Women. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/religionglobalsociety/2022/09/islam-women-and-sport-the-case-of-visible-muslim-women/ (Accessed on 15.05.25) 

McKeown, P., and Dunn, R.A. (2021) A ‘Life‑Style Choice’ or a Philosophical Belief?: The Argument for Veganism and Vegetarianism to be a Protected Philosophical Belief and the Position in England and Wales,’ Liverpool Law Review 42:207–241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09273-w 

Ramadan, (2022) ‘When faith intersects with gender: the challenges and successes in the experiences of Muslim women academics,’ Gender and Education, 34:1, 33-48, DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2021.1893664 

Rekis, J. (2023) ‘Religious Identity and Epistemic Injustice: An Intersectional Account.’ Hypatia 38, pp779–800. doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.86 

Trinity University (2016) Challenging Race, Religion, and Stereotypes in Classroom Available at: https://youtu.be/0CAOKTo_DOk (Accessed on 15.05.25)  

UAL (2025) Active Dashboards. Available at: https://dashboards.arts.ac.uk/dashboard/ActiveDashboards/DashboardPage.aspx?dashboardid=99b2fe03-d417-45d3-bea9-1a65ebc250ea&dashcontextid=638773918741985949 (Accessed on 15.05.25)  

Categories
Inclusive Practice Blogs

Inclusive Practice_ Blog Post One_ Disability

Crenshaw (1991, p.1245) highlights the ‘need to account for multiple grounds for identity’ in understanding the construction of the social world and asserts that individuals with ‘multiple targeted identities’ are disempowered through hegemony and systemic inequality. These identities are tied to social group membership (Lukkien, Chauhan and Otaye-Ebede, 2024. p.3), one such group identity being disability. The Social Model of Disability suggests that disability is constructed by barriers in the hegemonic social world and that this world can be (re)designed to include the needs and differences of all individuals (UAL, no date).  

What ‘makes people disabled is not their disability,’ rather it is barriers constructed in society; the Paralympics being evidence of an opportunity for ‘people to shine’ when these barriers are removed (Adeptian and Webborn, 2020). Whilst street level discrimination against both race and disability has reduced, the more difficult progress remains in tackling dominant social systems, and although Ade acknowledges his own empowered position as a sports and media personality, he represents both black and disabled identities and articulates the parallel struggle against systemic inequality (Ibid). He draws a comparison between the Paralympics and the Black Lives Matter movement as critical moments which made these struggles visible in the hegemonic social world. Whilst the narrative of his own lived experience alludes to the compounded disenfranchisement of intersectional identities, it was Stoke Mandeville hospital and the disability community where he found his ‘tribe’ (Ibid), this ultimately mitigating the disempowerment of being a Nigerian immigrant with polio growing up in East London.

Chay Brown (2023) explores complex intersectional identities as a trans, gay man, not neuro typical, and having experienced mental health difficulties, whilst acknowledging potential privilege within the trans community, as a white man. He identifies that for trans people, struggling with social situations and anxiety can present significant challenges specific to navigating the codes that exist within the LGBTQ+ community (Ibid). This highlights the complexity of intersecting identities within the membership of a wider disenfranchised group. Brown (2023) asserts that ‘If we’re not working for disabled trans people we’re not working for the trans community because we’re missing people out.’

Christine Sun Kim (2024), in her context as Asian American deaf artist, is driven to force the voice of the deaf community into the everyday lives of the hearing world. This is realized through her insistence on communicating through sign language, signs, symbols, infographics and scaled up captioning of the city – the sky; through creating a greater visibility of useful communications for deaf people she seeks to put deaf lives into the minds of the hearing, and challenge social norms (Ibid).

The common theme of these narratives is that the hegemonic (ableist) world, where the intersection of disability is made invisible, can be reconstructed at both the micro and macro level and provide access through making disabled people visible and included. If the world can be designed to accommodate differences, then it will work in optimizing opportunities for everyone.  

In the context of UAL, data suggests that there are improving opportunities for attainment: students with declared disabilities (see fig.1), achieving an overall 3pp higher than those without (Campos-Barbi, 2025a, p14), although completion rates for disabled students are significantly lower (Campos-Barbi, 2025b, p.12), and crucially this data does not take into account the intersection of other multiple identities of disempowerment (Crenshaw, 1991). This lack of an intersectional lens points to positionality (Bayeck, 2022) in the data design, interpretation, and potential impact.

Figure 1. Attainment Rates by Disability (6 way) 1st– 2:1 (Campos-Barbi, 2025a, p.15) 

Bayeck (2022, p.7) suggests it is the ‘complex interplay of identity, space and context’ that informs positionality. I consider the accessibility to learning spaces as afforded by the design of the university, and the design of my lessons in meeting the needs of complex student identities. However, I also consider this from the perspective of my own context as Language Development tutor. Crenshaw (1991, p.1249) identifies language barriers as a source of intersectional subordination which limit opportunity; language remains invisible in the UAL data. For example, a student asked me whether we could hold a tutorial online, they had disclosed to me that they had some mental health issues which prevented them from being able to attend in person; it was a small adjustment that I was happy to make. However, on reflection, did other aspects of privilege provide the agency for this solicitation? This student was female, white, British and speaks English as a first language. Would a more disenfranchising intersectionality have prevented this request from being made, resulting in a lack of participation? Would this have led to sub optimal attainment? 

References 

Adepitan, A. and Webborn, N. (2020). Nick Webborn interviews Ade Adepitan. ParalympicsGB Legends [Online]. Youtube. 27 August. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnRjdol_j0c  (Accessed on 23.04.25) 

Bayeck, R.Y. (2022) Positionality: ‘The Interplay of Space, Context and Identity,’ International Journal of Qualitative Methods Volume 21: 1–9: DOI: 10.1177/16094069221114745

Brown, C. (2023) Interview with ParaPride. Intersectionality in Focus: Empowering Voices during UK Disability History Month [Online]. Youtube. 13 December. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yID8_s5tjc (Accessed on 15.04.25) 

Campos- Barbi, T. (2025a) UAL Undergraduate Attainment Report 2023-24 Available at: https://canvas.arts.ac.uk/documents/sppreview/1cdc0ff4-8830-4787-b187-f7db576ab259 (Accessed on 23.04.25) 

Campos-Barbi, T. (2025b) UAL Undergraduate Completion Report 2023-24. Available at: https://canvas.arts.ac.uk/documents/sppreview/99c0212e-0eb0-47c0-97e9-2038d9d407cf (Accessed on 23.04.25) 

Crenshaw, K. (1991) ‘Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.’ Stanford Law Review 43 (6), pp.1241-1299   

Lukkien, T., Chauhan, T. and Otaye‐Ebede, L. (2024) ‘Addressing the diversity principle–practice gap in Western higher education institutions: A systematic review on intersectionality.’ British Educational Research Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4096., pp2-7 and pp17-20   

Sun, C. (2024). Christine Sun Kim in ‘Friends & Strangers’ – Season 11 | Art21. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://youtu.be/2NpRaEDlLsI  (Accessed on 23.04.25)  

UAL (no date) ‘The Social Model of Disability at UAL.’ Available at: https://youtu.be/mNdnjmcrzgw (Accessed on 19.04.25).